CONVERSE

v.

MINNESOTA THRESHER MFG. CO.; SAME V. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF SUFFIELD

Citator

Cited By

• Converse v. Hamilton, 224 U.S. 243 (U.S. 1912)
  …ction. In such case we think the receiver may sue in a foreign jurisdiction. Relfe v. Rundle, 103 U. S. 222, 226; Howarth v. Lombard, 175 Massachusetts, 570; Howarth v. Angle, 162 N. Y. 179, 182.” And in Converse v. First National Bank of Suffield, 212 U. S. 567, where, in a similar action, the Supreme Court of Errors of Connecticut had given judgment against the receiver, this court reversed the judgment on the authority of Bernheimer v. Converse, supra. True, the full faith and credit clause of the Const…
• Keatley v. Furey, 226 U.S. 399 (U.S. 1912)
  …U. S. 561, 574. The effect of such a provision need not be considered in this case. In some instances, at least, it would be enforced outside of the State. Bernheimer v. Converse, 206 U. S. 516, 534. Converse v. Minnesota Thresher Manufacturing Co., 212 U. S. 567. Converse v. Hamilton, 224 U. S. 243, 257. See Chipman v. Manufacturers’ Nat. Bank, 156 Massachusetts, 147, 148, 149. Haskell v. Merrill, 179 Massachusetts, 120, 124. The statute of Wést Virginia on the other hand provides for the appointment of rec…

Authorities Cited

• Bernheimer v. Converse, 206 U.S. 516 (U.S. 1907)