ST. PAUL, MINNEAPOLIS & MANITOBA RAILWAY COMPANY
v.
STATE OF MINNESOTA EX REL. CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS
ST. PAUL, MINNEAPOLIS & MANITOBA RAILWAY COMPANY
STATE OF MINNESOTA EX REL. CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS
214 U.S. 497
Supreme Court of the United States (1909)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 10 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam:
Judgment affirmed on authority of Northern Pacific Railway Company v. State of Minnesota ex rel. Duluth, 208 U. S. 583.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
The Fla. E. Coast Ry. Co. v. The City of Miami, 76 Fla. 277 (Fla. 1918)…public safety. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy R. R. Co. v. Nebraska ex rel. Omaha, 170 U. S. 57.” This holding has been expressly reaffirmed in the following cases: St. Paul, Minneapolis & M. R. Co. v. State of Minnesota ex rel. City of Minneapolis, 214 U. S. 497, 29 Sup. Ct. Rep. 698; Chicago, M. & St. P. R. Co. v. City of Minneapolis, 232 U. S. 430, 34 Sup. Ct. Rep. 400; Great Northern Railway Company and Willmar & Sioux Falls Railway Co. v. State ex rel. Village of Clara City Supra. The police power is o…
-
Erie R.R. Co. v. Bd. of Pub. Util. Comm'rs, 254 U.S. 394 (U.S. 1921)
-
Chicago v. City of Minneapolis, 232 U.S. 430 (U.S. 1914)…R. Co. v. Bristol, 151 U. S. 556, 567; C., B. & Q. R. R. Co. v. Chicago, 166 U. S. 226, 252, 255; C., B. & Q. R. R. Co. v. Nebraska, 170 U. S. 57; Northern Pacific Ry. Co. v. Duluth, 208 U. S. 583, 597; St. P:, Minn. & Man. Ry. Co. v. Minnesota, 214 U. S. 497; C., I. & W. Ry. Co. v. Connersville, 218 U. S. 336, 343, 344. See also Detroit &c. Railway v. Osborn, 189 U. S. 383; New Orleans Gaslight Co. v. Drainage Com’n, 197 U. S. 453, 462; C., B. & Q. Ry. Co. v. Drainage Com’rs, 200 U. S. 561, 592, 593; At…1 / 2
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- N. Pac. Ry. Co. v. State of Minn. Ex rel. the City of Duluth, 208 U.S. 583 (U.S. 1908)