FANNIE FINKS ET AL., PETITIONERS,

v.

FRED FLEMING ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Bianchi v. Barili, 168 F.2d 793 (9th Cir. 1948)
  …eds & Catlin v. Victor Talking Mach. Co., 213 U.S. 301, 318, 29 S.Ct. 495, 53 L.Ed. 805; Diamond Rubber Co. v. Consol. Tire Co., 220 U.S. 428, 443, 31 S.Ct. 444, 55 L.Ed. 527; Yesbera v. Hardesty Mfg. Co., 6 Cir., 166 F. 120, 125, certiorari denied, 214 U.S. 513, 514, 29 S.Ct. 696, 53 L.Ed. 1063. See also 2 Walker § 163,. page 757: “A patentee is at liberty to select and supply bis own dictionary.” gee also 3 Walker § 464, pages 1700-1701; § 466, page 1703; cf. Miller v. Eagle Manufacturing Co., 151 U.S.…
• Deering v. Gilbert, 269 F.2d 191 (2d Cir. 1959)
  …xposed to indirect and less definite and certain methods of proof. Armstrong v. Belding Bros. & Co., 2 Cir., 297 F. 728, certiorari denied 265 U.S. 585, 44 S.Ct. 459, 68 L.Ed. 1192; Yesbera v. Hardesty Mfg. Co., 6 Cir., 166 F. 120, certiorari denied 214 U.S. 513, 29 S.Ct. 696, 53 L.Ed. 1063. And where, as here, the defendant controls the most satisfactory evidence of sales the plaintiff needs only establish a basis for a reasoned conclusion as to the extent of injury caused by the deliberate and wrongful in…
• Banque de France v. Chase Nat. Bank of City of N.Y., 60 F.2d 703 (2d Cir. 1932)
  …sion of the wood was rejected. War conditions and the difficulty in obtaining proof was a hindrance and a handicap to the appellant, but that does not excuse failure of proof. Yesbera v. Hardesty Mfg. Co., 166 F. 120 (C. C. A. 6), certiorari denied 214 U. S. 513, 29 S. Ct. 696, 53 L. Ed. 1063; Life & Fire Ins. Co. v. Mechanic Fire Ins. Co., 7 Wend. (N. Y.) 31; Webb v. Bowden, 124 Ark. 244, 187 S. W. 461, Ann. Cas. 1918A, 60; Patch Mfg. Co. v. Protection Lodge, 77 Vt. 294, 60 A. 74, 107 Am. St. Rep. 765. It…