O. J. HILL ET AL., PETITIONERS,

v.

GEORGE W. WALKER, ETC.

Citator

Cited By

• Chow Bing KEW v. United States, 248 F.2d 466 (9th Cir. 1957)
  …— they clearly mean that he acted “wilfully” in [*472] making his false statement that he is a citizen of the United States. This question has been considered by us repeatedly. In Nickell v. United States, 9 Cir., 161 F. 702, 706, certiorari denied 214 U.S. 517, 29 S.Ct. 699, 53 L.Ed. 1064,2 it was contended that the indictment failed to charge that the following acts were done wilfully as required by the statute: “When, in truth and in fact, as each of the said persons would then well know, and as they,…
• Sutton v. Pac. S. S. Co. (W.D. Wash. 1924)
  …). [1,2] The petition on removal prima facie fixes the jurisdiction in this court, which continues until it is established to a “legal certainty” that the court is without jurisdiction. Hill v. Walker, 167 F. 241, 92 C. C. A. 633, certiorari denied 214 U. S. 517, 29 S. Ct. 698, 53 L. Ed. 1064, followed by the Circuit Court of Appeals of this circuit in Big Sespe Oil Co. v. Cochran, 276 F. 216. The above is the substance of the record as to the citizenship of the plaintiff. The petition on removal asserts t…