WALTER S. EDDY ET AL., ETC., PETITIONERS,

v.

CAROLINE M. EDDY

Citator

Cited By

• Whitfield v. Whitfield, 127 Fla. 74 (Fla. 1937)
  …Beav. 632; In re Ashwell’s Will, Johns Eng. Chan. 122; Snow v. Booth, 2 Kay & J. 132; Oil Co. v. Hawkins, 20 C. C. A. 468, 74 Fed. 395, 33 L. R. A. 739.’ ” On petition for certiorari to the Supreme Court of the United States the same was denied. 214 U. S. 518, 53 L. Ed. 1065. [*80] In Pomeroy’s Equity Jurisprudence, 4th Ed., Vol.'2, page 2047, the author states the law applicable to a purchase by a trustee from his cestui que trust as follows: “A purchase by a trustee from his cestui que trust, even for…
• Howell v. Witman-Schwartz Corp., 7 F.2d 513 (3d Cir. 1925)
  …eneral, and has become established as a part of the law of the state, a federal court will follow the decisions of the state court of last resort. Snare & Triest Co. v. Friedman, 169 F. 1, 94 C. C. A. 369, 40 L. R. A. (N. S.) 367 (certiorari denied, 214 U. S. 518, 29 S. Ct. 700, 53 L. Ed. 1065); Public Service Co. v. Wursthorn et al. (C. C. A.) 278 F. 408; George N. Berlet, Receiver of the Globe Silk Mills, v. Lehigh Valley Silk Mills (C. C. A.) 287 F. 769. But the facts in this case are very different from…