THOMAS

v.

IOWA

U.S. | 1909-12-20

No. 448

215 U.S. 591 Supreme Court of the United States (1909) Positive Treatment

Cited by 4 cases

Per_curiam

Per Curiam.

Writ of error dismissed for want of. jurisdiction. No further opinion will be filed.1

This case had been once before to this court on writ of error and the writ dismissed. See 209 U. S. 258

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Payne v. SS Tropic Breeze, 423 F.2d 236 (1st Cir. 1970)

…ims for expenses while the ship was in custodia legis and for statutory double wages were allowed at 293 F.Supp. 425 (D.P.R.1968). . United States Consol. Seeded Raisin Co. v. Chaddock & Co., 173 F. 577, 97 C.C.A. 527 (9th Cir. 1909). cert. denied, 215 U.S. 591, 30 S.Ct. 407, 54 L.Ed. 340 (1910); Gramling v. Food Mach. & Chem. Corp., 151 F.Supp. 853 (W.D.S.C. 1957). . Kane v. Roxy Theatres Corp., 63 F. 2d 754, 756 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, New York Edison Co. v. Kosch, 289 U.S. 751, 53 S.Ct. 695, 77 L.Ed.…
Gale H. Johnson v. Bennett, 414 F.2d 50 (8th Cir. 1969)

…evident. Thus in State v. Matheson, 130 Iowa 440, 103 N.W. 137, 141 (1905), the court characterized its approval of the instruction as “a somewhat anomalous rule.” In State v. Thomas, 135 Iowa 717, 109 N.W. 900, 902 (1906), writ of error dismissed, 215 U.S. 591, 30 S.Ct. 407, 54 L.Ed. 340, the court referred to its holding as “in some respects peculiar to this state.” In State v. Bosworth, 170 Iowa 329, 152 N.W. 581, 586 (1915), the court observed, “It is none too clear what is meant by the rule * * *." An…

1 / 2

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw