WILLIAM F. GOESSLING, PETITIONER,
v.
THOMAS B. COLLIER
WILLIAM F. GOESSLING, PETITIONER,
THOMAS B. COLLIER
215 U.S. 596
Supreme Court of the United States (1909)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
N. Pac. Ry. Co. & Cont'l Oil Co. v. United States, 277 F.2d 615 (10th Cir. 1960)…gin to run until there is someone capable of instituting the action, someone subject to be sued, and a tribunal open for such suits. Yager v. Liberty Royalties Corp., 8 Cir., 123 F. 2d 44; Collier v. Goessling, 6 Cir., 160 F. 604, certiorari denied, 215 U.S. 596, 30 S.Ct. 399, 54 L.Ed. 342; Peyton v. Chase County National Bank, 124 Kan. 763, 262 P. 595. On account of the immunity of the United States from suits without its consent, Northern Pacific and Continental could not institute against it an action f…