SAMUEL GOMPERS ET AL., PETITIONERS,

v.

THE BUCK'S STOVE & RANGE COMPANY

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Giles, 300 U.S. 41 (U.S. 1937)
• United States v. Cauble, 706 F.2d 1322 (5th Cir. 1983)
  …9 F. 940, 945 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 241 U.S. 668, 36 S.Ct. 552, 60 L.Ed. 1229 (1916). . United States v. Morse, 161 F. 429, 435 (C.C.S.D.N.Y.1908) (“authority” to commit a crime impossible), aff’d per curiam, 174 F. 539 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 215 U.S. 605, 30 S.Ct. 406, 54 L.Ed. 346 (1909); Rieger v. United States, 107 F. 916, 925 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 181 U.S. 617, 21 S.Ct. 923, 45 L.Ed. 1030 (1901). . 654 F. 2d at 328 (quoting United States v. Beran, 546 F. 2d 1316, 1321 (8th Cir.1976), cert.…
• United States v. Wilson, 500 F.2d 715 (5th Cir. 1974)
  …either to his own use or to the use of a third person, with the intent to injure or defraud the bank. United States v. Steinman, 172 F. 913 (3 Cir. 1909), United States v. Morse, 161 F. 429 (2 Cir. 1908), aff’d. 174 F. 539 (2 Cir. 1909), cert. den. 215 U.S. 605, 30 S.Ct. 406, 54 L.Ed. 346 (1909). Furthermore, recent cases have held that reckless disregard of the interest of a bank is, for the purpose of “willful misapplication,” the equivalent of intent to injure or defraud. Logsdon v. United States, 253…