UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, SUING AT THE COSTS AND FOR THE BENEFIT OF PENN IRON COMPANY, LIMITED, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,

v.

WILLIAM R. TRIGG COMPANY AND VIRGINIA TRUST COMPANY

Citator

Cited By

• Velazquez v. People of Puerto RICO, 77 F.2d 431 (1st Cir. 1935)
  …y 17, 1909, at the opening of the October term, 1909, of the Supreme Court of the United States, to wit, on October 11, 1909, the two appeals pending-in that court were “dismissed, per stipulation.” See People of Porto Rico v. Roman Catholic Church, 215 U. S. 611, 30 S. Ct. 397, 54 L. Ed. 348. The government of the people of Porto Rico certainly had no jurisdiction, political or legislative, over the Barracks, the place where the offense was committed, prior to May 1, 1900. First, because the United States,…
• Irwin v. United States, 122 F.2d 73 (D.C. Cir. 1941)
  …given to secure the performance of a contract with the United States, unless some federal statute authorizes it. United States v. Faircloth, 49 App.D.C. 323, 265 F. 963; Penn Iron Co. v. Trigg Co., 106 Va. 557, 56 S.E. 329, writ of error dismissed, 215 U.S. 611, 30 S.Ct. 397, 54 L.Ed. 348. We are by no means unmindful of the strong equities of appellee’s case, and we would, if we could, enforce them. But since, as we view the case, to do so would involve the setting aside of an established rule of law and…