GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, PETITIONER,
v.
THE RICHMOND STREET & INTERURBAN RAILWAY COMPANY
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, PETITIONER,
THE RICHMOND STREET & INTERURBAN RAILWAY COMPANY
216 U.S. 620
Supreme Court of the United States (1910)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Master Shipping Agency, Inc. v. Farida, 571 F.2d 131 (2d Cir. 1978)…expenditure. See Moore-McCormack Lines v. The Esso Camden, supra, 244 F. 2d at 202; Gray’s Harbor Tugboat Co. v. Petersen, 250 F. 956, 959 (9th Cir. 1918); Erie & Western Transportation Co. v. City of Chicago, 178 F. 42, 51 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 216 U.S. 620, 30 S.Ct. 574, 54 L.Ed. 641 (1910); The Energia, 66 F. 604, 608 (2d Cir. 1895); Compania Punta Alta, S. A. v. Dalzell, 162 F.Supp. 926, 930 (S.D.N.Y.1958). Appellants contend, however, that when the owners of the Farida discovered the cause of her…
-
Goldstone v. Payne, 94 F.2d 855 (2d Cir. 1938)…, 3 Cir., 11 F. 2d 474; United States v. New York & O. S. S. Co., 2 Cir., 216 F. 61, 67. The appellee relies also upon two decisions of this court. The first, O. J. Lewis Mercantile Co. v. Klepner, 2 Cir., 176 F. 343, at page 346, certiorari denied 216 U.S. 620, 30 S.Ct. 575, 54 L.Ed. 641, cites Merchants Co. v. Clow & Sons, supra, for the following statement: “Again, the defendant interposed a counterclaim and, having invoked the jurisdiction of the court for its own benefit, is now estopped from denying…
-
Ginsburg v. Pac. Mut. Life Ins. Co. of Cal., 69 F.2d 97 (2d Cir. 1934)…rclaim interposed establishes the jurisdiction of the District Court. Merchants’ Heat & Light Co. v. James B. Clow & Sons, 204 U. S. 286, 27 S. Ct. 285, 51 L. Ed. 488; O. J. Lewis Mercantile Co. v. Klepner, 176 F. 343 (C. C. A. 2), certiorari denied 216 U. S. 620, 30 S. Ct. 575, 54 L. Ed. 641. It seeks a repudiation and cancellation of a policy of insurance which involves a valuation of more than the $3,000. In Home Life Insurance Co. v. Sipp, 11 F.(2d) 474, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals held that where…