D. L. HENDERSON, TRUSTEE, ETC., PETITIONER,

v.

SAM MAYER

Citator

Cited By

• Waskey v. Hammer, 223 U.S. 85 (U.S. 1912)
  …ake a location under the,mining laws. The jury returned a verdict as directed, judgment was entered thereon, the judgment was affirmed by the Cir-. cuit" Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 170 Fed. Rep. 31, and the case is here upon certiorari. 216 U. S. 622) • Conceding that, the unintentional inclusion of a trifle' ¿more .than twenty acres in the Bon Voyage as originally located was an irregularity which did not vitiate the location, but merely made it necessary that thev excess be excluded when it b…
• United States v. Samson Eisner (Principal) & United Bonding Ins. Co. (Surety), 323 F.2d 38 (6th Cir. 1963)
  …Ed. 922; St. Pierre v. United States, 319 U.S. 41, 63 S.Ct. 910, 87 L.Ed. 1199. Counsel for appellants relies strongly upon Orth v. Steger, 258 F. 625, 626, S.D.N.Y., and Waskey v. Hammer, 179 F. 273, 274, C.A.9th, cert. denied, Waskey v. Chambers, 216 U.S. 622, 30 S.Ct. 577, 54 L.Ed. 641, holding that a writ of certiorari to a subordinate court operates as a stay of proceedings from the time of its service or of formal notice of its issuance. Those cases deal with situations where the writ was issued. The…