JOAQUIN GIL, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
v.
THE UNITED STATES

U.S. | 1910-02-21
No. 803
216 U.S. 623 Supreme Court of the United States (1910) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Weiss v. Cent. R.R. Co. OF NEW Jersey, 235 F.2d 309 (2d Cir. 1956)
    …of maintaining himself during his illness. It is significant that maintenance and cure was originally limited to the period of the voyage or of the seaman’s contract. Cornell Steamboat Co. v. Fallon, 2 Cir.1909, 179 F. 293, cer-tiorari denied 1910, 216 U.S. 623, 30 S. Ct. 577, 54 L.Ed. 642. Enochasson v. Freeport Sulphur Co., D.C.S.D.Tex.1925, 7 F. 2d 674. It was only during this period that the seaman could have anticipated that the ship would maintain him. The seaman’s complete dependence upon the ship…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw