SCHULTZ
v.
DIEHL

U.S. | 1910-04-25
No. 166
217 U.S. 594 Supreme Court of the United States (1910) Positive Treatment
Cited by 5 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

Decree reversed with costs and cause remanded to be proceeded in according to law. Jellenik v. Huron Copper Mining Company, 177 U. S. 1; 18 Stat. 470, c. 137, § 8; Code of Oregon, §§ 5064, 300, 301.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Direction Der Disconto-Gesellschaft v. United States Steel Corp., 267 U.S. 22 (U.S. 1925)
  • McQUILLEN v. Nat'l Cash Register Co., 112 F.2d 877 (4th Cir. 1940)
    …believe this conclusion is correct. As did he, so do we, believe that this holding is justified by the decisions of the U. S. Supreme Court in Jellenik v. Huron Copper-Mining Co., 177 U.S. 1, 20 S.Ct. 559, 44 L.Ed. 647, and Schultz v. [*881] Diehl, 217 U.S. 594, 30 S.Ct. 694, 54 L.Ed. 896. The Jellenik case was cited and approved in this connection by the Supreme Court in Rogers v. Guaranty Trust Co., 288 U.S. 123, 132, 53 S.Ct. 295-298, 77 L.Ed. 652, 89 A.L.R. 720. See -also, Rose, Federal Jurisdiction an…
  • Brach v. Moen, 4 F.2d 786 (8th Cir. 1925)
    …31 S. Ct. 412, 55 L. Ed. 443; Greeley v. Lowe, 155 U. S. 58, 15 S. Ct. 24, 39 L. Ed. 69; Dick v. Foraker, 155 U. S. 404, 15 S. Ct. 124, 39 L. Ed. 201; Jellenik v. Huron Copper Mining Co., 177 U. S. 1, 20 S. Ct. 559, 44 L. Ed. 647; Schultz v. Diehl, 217 U. S. 594,. 30 S. Ct. 694, 54 L. Ed. 896. Of course, Mrs. Upton and Mrs. Brach could have applied for leave to become parties, and perhaps in not doing so, and in plaintiff not, making them parties, there is some jockey [*793] ing for position. A court of eq…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw