BRADY
v.
BERNARD & KITTINGER

U.S. | 1910-05-02
No. 501
217 U.S. 595 Supreme Court of the United States (1910) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases

Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

Appeal dismissed for want of jurisdiction and petition for writ of certiorari denied.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Chicago v. Leverentz, 19 F.2d 915 (8th Cir. 1927)
    …203 U. S. 141, 27 S. Ct. 50, 51 L. Ed. 128. This case by analogy is quite persuasive. Old Nick Williams Co. v. U. S., 215 U. S. 541, 544, 30 S. Ct. 221, 54 L. Ed. 318; Brady v. Bernard & Kittinger (C. C. A.) 170 F. 576; Brady v. Bernard & Kittinger, 217 U. S. 595, 30 S. Ct. 695, 54 L. Ed. 896; Ewing v. Russell Hardware Co. (C. C. A.) 287 F. 535; In re Community Finance Co. (C. C. A.) 295 F. 773, 776; In re Stearns & White Co. (C. C. A.) 295 F. 833, 840. “To save the right to sue out a writ of error and to e…
  • Robinson v. Edler, 78 F.2d 817 (9th Cir. 1935)
    …hat, if the order is not appealable, this court has no jurisdiction, and, further, that it is the duty of the court to raise, the question of jurisdiction of its own motion. Brady v. Bernard & Kittinger (C. C. A.) 170 F. 576, 579, certiorari denied, 217 U. S. 595, 30 S. Ct. 695, 54 L. Ed. 896; City and County of San Francisco v. McLaughlin (C. C. A.) 9 F.(2d) 390; Highway Construction Company v. McClelland (C. C. A.) 14 F.(2d) 406; Equitable Life Assurance Society v. Rayl (C. C. A.) 16 F.(2d) 68; Dyar v. McC…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw