BRADY
v.
BERNARD & KITTINGER
BRADY
BERNARD & KITTINGER
217 U.S. 595
Supreme Court of the United States (1910)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
Appeal dismissed for want of jurisdiction and petition for writ of certiorari denied.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Chicago v. Leverentz, 19 F.2d 915 (8th Cir. 1927)…203 U. S. 141, 27 S. Ct. 50, 51 L. Ed. 128. This case by analogy is quite persuasive. Old Nick Williams Co. v. U. S., 215 U. S. 541, 544, 30 S. Ct. 221, 54 L. Ed. 318; Brady v. Bernard & Kittinger (C. C. A.) 170 F. 576; Brady v. Bernard & Kittinger, 217 U. S. 595, 30 S. Ct. 695, 54 L. Ed. 896; Ewing v. Russell Hardware Co. (C. C. A.) 287 F. 535; In re Community Finance Co. (C. C. A.) 295 F. 773, 776; In re Stearns & White Co. (C. C. A.) 295 F. 833, 840. “To save the right to sue out a writ of error and to e…
-
Robinson v. Edler, 78 F.2d 817 (9th Cir. 1935)…hat, if the order is not appealable, this court has no jurisdiction, and, further, that it is the duty of the court to raise, the question of jurisdiction of its own motion. Brady v. Bernard & Kittinger (C. C. A.) 170 F. 576, 579, certiorari denied, 217 U. S. 595, 30 S. Ct. 695, 54 L. Ed. 896; City and County of San Francisco v. McLaughlin (C. C. A.) 9 F.(2d) 390; Highway Construction Company v. McClelland (C. C. A.) 14 F.(2d) 406; Equitable Life Assurance Society v. Rayl (C. C. A.) 16 F.(2d) 68; Dyar v. McC…