INTERNATIONAL TEXTBOOK COMPANY
v.
PETERSON; SAME V. LYNCH
INTERNATIONAL TEXTBOOK COMPANY
PETERSON; SAME V. LYNCH
218 U.S. 664
Supreme Court of the United States (1910)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 31 S. Ct. 225 · 54 L. Ed. 1201 · SCDB 1910-183 · 1910 U.S. LEXIS 2058
Cited by 17 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam:
Substantially the same question of Federal law involved in these two cases arose under a Kansas statute in International Textbook Co. v. Pigg, 217 U. S. 91; and the Federal right asserted in that case was sustained. There is no difference in principle between the two cases last named and the Pigg case, although the Federal question involved in them, arises under the statutes, respectively, of other States — Wisconsin and Vermont. In view of the pleadings and the conceded facts in these cases the judgment in each of them must be reversed on the authority , of the Pigg case, and the cases are severally remanded for such further proceedings as is required by and is not inconsistent with this opinion.
It is so ordered.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Sioux Remedy Co. v. Cope, 235 U.S. 197 (U.S. 1914)
-
Buck Stove & Range Co. v. Vickers, 226 U.S. 205 (U.S. 1912)…Railroad Co., 16 How. 104, and Stephens v. Monongahela Bank, 111 U. S. 197, illustrate .its application in cases brought here from [*213] circuit courts, and International Textbook Co. v. Pigg, 217 U. S. 91, and International Textbook Co. v. Lynch, 218 U. S. 664, are cases in which it was not applied upon writs of error to state courts. This difference in the treatment of the two classes of cases has not been inadvertent but deliberate, and the reason for it is at once apparent when § 22 of the original Jud…1 / 2
-
Hemphill v. Orloff, 277 U.S. 537 (U.S. 1928)
Previewing 3 of 8 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Int'l Textbook Co. v. Pigg, 217 U.S. 91 (U.S. 1910)