BUCK'S STOVE & RANGE COMPANY
v.
AMERICAN FEDERATION OF LABOR; AMERICAN FEDERATION OF LABOR V. BUCK'S STOVE & RANGE COMPANY

U.S. | 1911-01-27
Nos. 190, 394
219 U.S. 581 Supreme Court of the United States (1911) Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 55 L. Ed. 345 · 31 S. Ct. 472 · 1911 U.S. LEXIS 2021 · SCDB 1910-184
Cited by 31 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam:

Per Curiam:

When these cases were reached for hearing and after the argument had materially progressed, it developed from statements made by counsel for both parties that the cases had become purely moot because of the settlement between the parties of every material controversy which the record presented. On the disclosure of this situation further argument was dispensed with; and for the reason which led to that action, that is, as we have said, that the controversies between the parties had -become in all respects moot, the appeals must be dismissed. Richardson v. McChesney, 218 U. S. 487, 492, and cases cited. Appeals dismissed, without costs to either party.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Gompers v. Bucks Stove & Range Co., 221 U.S. 418 (U.S. 1911)
    …omplete settlement of all matters involved in the case of Bucks Stove & Range Company v. The American Federation of Labor et al. This court therefore declined to further consider the case, which had become moot, and those two appeals were dismissed. 219 U. S. 581. When the main case was settled, every proceeding which was dependent on it, or a part of it, was also necessarily settled — of course without prejudice to the power and right of the court to punish for contempt by proper proceediiigs. Worden v. Sea…
  • Waialua AGR. Co. v. Maneja, 178 F.2d 603 (9th Cir. 1949)
    …eze Corporations, Inc., et al., 323 U.S. 316, 324-325, 65 S.Ct. 298, 89 L.Ed. 264. . Paradise Land & Livestock Co. v. Federal Land Bank of Berkeley. 10 Cir., 147 F. 2d 594; Buck’s Stove & Range Company v. American Federation of Labor, 219 U.S. 584, 31 S.Ct. 472, 55 L.Ed. 345; Dakota County v. Glidden, 113 U.S. 222, 223-224, 5 S.Ct. 428, 28 L.Ed. 981. . St. Pierre v. United States, 319 U.S. 41, 42, 63 S.Ct. 910, 87 L.Ed. 1199. . United States and Interstate Commerce Commission v. Alaska Steamship Co., 253…
  • Trans Int'l Airlines, Inc. v. Int'l Bhd. OF Teamsters, 650 F.2d 949 (9th Cir. 1980)
    …s also affirmed. By the time the appeals from the original injunction reached the Supreme Court, the parties had settled their differences. The Court accordingly dismissed the appeal as moot. Buck’s Stove & Range Co. v. American Federation of Labor, 219 U.S. 581, 31 S.Ct. 472, 55 L.Ed. 345 (1911). Thereafter the Court also dismissed the appeal of the contempt adjudication as moot. It held: [W]hen the main cause .was terminated by a settlement of all differences between the parties, the complainant did not…
    1 / 2

Previewing 3 of 9 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw