STEWART
v.
INGLE AND OTHERS

U.S. | 1824-02-24
9 Wheat. 526 Supreme Court of the United States (1824) Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 6 L. Ed. 151 · 1824 U.S. LEXIS 386 · SCDB 1824-041
Cited by 7 cases

Opinion of the Court
Mr. Justice Washington,

Mr. Justice Washington,

after consultation with the Judges, stated, that according to the rules and practice of the Court, a return made by by the Clerk was a sufficient return.

Motion denied.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Deans v. Wilcoxon, 18 Fla. 531 (Fla. 1882)
  • Worcester v. The State of Ga., 6 Pet. 515 (U.S. 1832)
    …te of the writ. The record, in this case, is duly certified by the clerk of the court of appeals, and annexed to the writ of error. The objection, therefore, which has been urged to the sufficiency of the return, cannot prevail.” — 1 Wheat. 304. In 9 Wheat. 526, in the case of Stewart v. Ingle and others, which was a writ of error to the circuit court for the district of Columbia, a certiorari was issued, upon a suggestion of diminution in the record, which, was'returned by the clerk with another record; w…
  • Hedberg v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 350 F.2d 924 (8th Cir. 1965)
    …(1947). In a replevin action, where title is being litigated, the value of the property is the amount in controversy. Gibson v. Shufeldt, 122 U.S. 27, 29, 7 S.Ct. 1066, 30 L.Ed. 1083 (1887); Peyton v. Robertson, 9 Wheat. 527, 528, 22 U.S. 527, 528, 6 L.Ed. 151 (1824). In an injunction suit the amount in controversy may be tested by the value of the right sought to be gained by the plaintiff. Glenwood Light & Water Co. v. Mutual Light, Heat & Power Co., 239 U.S. 121, 125, 36 S.Ct. 30, 60 L.Ed. 174 (1915);…

Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw