M'IVER AND OTHERS
v.
WATTLES
M'IVER AND OTHERS
WATTLES
9 Wheat. 650
Supreme Court of the United States (1824)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 6 L. Ed. 182 · 1824 U.S. LEXIS 403 · SCDB 1824-005
Cited by 26 cases
Opinion of the Court
Mr. Chief Justice Marshall said, that ill all cases where the cause is dismissed for want of jurisdiction, no costs are allowed.
Motion denied.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (11 total)
-
Mansfield v. Swan & Another, 111 U.S. 379 (U.S. 1884)…were manifestly designed to avoid the application of the general rule, which, in cases where the suit failed for want of jurisdiction, , denied the authority of the court to award judgment against the losing party, even for costs. McIver v. Wattles, 9 Wheat. 650; The Mayor v. Cooper, 6 Wall. 247. As to costs in this court, the question is not covered by any statutory provision, and must be settled on other grounds. Ordinarily, by the long established practice and universally recognized rule of the common l…
-
Lion Bonding & Sur. Co. v. Karatz, 262 U.S. 640 (U.S. 1923)…259 Fed. 70; In re Williams, 240 Fed. 788; In re Standard Fuller’s Earth Co., 186 Fed. 578; In re Rogers, 116 Fed. 435. Compare In re Watts, 190 U. S. 1; Randolph v. Scruggs, 190 U. S. 533. Inglee v. Coolidge, 2 Wheat. 363, 368; McIver v. Wattles, 9 Wheat. 650; Strader v. Graham, 18 How. 602; Citizens’ Bank v. Cannon, 164 U. S. 319. In removal cases the rule was changed by Act of March 3, 1875, c. 137, § 5, 18 Stat.,470, 472; Josslyn v. Phillips, 27 Fed. 481; Mansfield, Coldwater & Lake Michigan Ry. Co. v…
-
Hornthall v. The Collector, 9 Wall. 560 (U.S. 1869)
Previewing 3 of 11 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence