RAT PORTAGE LUMBER COMPANY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
v.
THE STATE OF MINNESOTA; LESURE LUMBER COMPANY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, V. THE STATE OF MINNESOTA

U.S. | 1911-04-17
Nos. 120 and No. 121
220 U.S. 606 Supreme Court of the United States (1911) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction. First National Bank v. Estherville, 215 U. S. 341, 346; Rogers v. Clark Iron Co., 217 U. S. 589; Farrell v. O’Brien, 199 U. S. 100; Griffith v. Connecticut, 218 U. S. 563, 571; St. Paul Gas Light Co. v. St. Paul, 181 U. S. 142, 151.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Viereck v. United States, 318 U.S. 236 (U.S. 1943)
    …thorized by Congress. United States v. George, 228 U. S. 14, 20-22; Williamson v. United States, 207 U. S. 425, 453-62; United States v. Standard Brewery, 251 U. S. [*242] 210, 219-20; United States v. Eaton, 144 U. S. 677; United States v. Grimaud, 220 U. S. 606; United States v. Smull, 236 U. S. 405; In re Kollock, 165 U. S. 526. Penal sanctions attach here for willful failure to file a statement when required, or if the registrant “willfully omits to state any material fact required to be stated.” Unless…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw