MISSOURI, KANSAS & TEXAS RAILWAY COMPANY OF TEXAS, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
v.
HARRY C. BAILEY
MISSOURI, KANSAS & TEXAS RAILWAY COMPANY OF TEXAS, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
HARRY C. BAILEY
220 U.S. 608
Supreme Court of the United States (1911)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
The judgment is affirmed, with costs. Missouri Pacific Ry. Co. v. Mackey, 127 U. S. 205; Minneapolis Ry. Co. v. Herrick, 127 U. S. 210; Chicago &c. R. R. v. Pontius, 157 U. S. 209; Tullis v. Lake Erie & W. Ry., 175 U. S. 348; El Paso & N. E. Ry. v. Gutierrez, 215 U. S. 87; Chicago, B. & Quincy R. R. Co. v. McGuire, 219 U. S. 549, 564.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Chenery Corp. v. Sec. & Exch. Comm'n (federal Water & Gas Corp., 128 F.2d 303 (D.C. Cir. 1942)…U.S. 670, 36 S.Ct. 721, 60 L.Ed. 1230. Federal Trade Commission v. R. F. Keppel & Bro., Inc., 291 U.S. 304, 310-312, 54 S.Ct. 423, 78 L.Ed. 814. Philadelphia, Baltimore & Washington R. R. v. Tucker, 35 App.D.C. 123, 148, L.R.A.1915C, 39, affirmed, 220 U.S. 608, 31 S.Ct. 725, 55 L.Ed. 607; Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Marshall, 2 Cir., 125 F. 2d 943, 945; Missel v. Overnight Motor Transp. Co., Inc., 4 Cir., 126 F. 2d 98, 102, 103. 291 U.S. 304, 310-312, 54 S.Ct. 423, 425, 78 L.Ed. 814. 41 Stat. 47…1 / 2
Authorities Cited
- Chicago v. McGUIRE, 219 U.S. 549 (U.S. 1911)
- Mo. Pac. Ry. Co. v. MacKey, 127 U.S. 205 (U.S. 1888)
- El Paso & Ne. Ry. Co. v. Gutierrez, 215 U.S. 87 (U.S. 1909)
- Tullis v. Lake Erie & W. R.R. Co., 175 U.S. 348 (U.S. 1899)
- Minneapolis & ST. Louis Ry. Co. v. Herrick, 127 U.S. 210 (U.S. 1888)
- Chicago v. Pontius, 157 U.S. 209 (U.S. 1895)