JOHN HART, PETITIONER,

v.

THE UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Fouts v. United States, 253 F.2d 215 (6th Cir. 1958)
  …Accordingly, we have held that a defendant may not complain of delay occasioned by [*218] his becoming a fugitive from justice during the period in which his indictment was pending. Hart v. United States, 6 Cir., 1910, 183 F. 368, certiorari denied 220 U.S. 609, 31 S.Ct. 714, 55 L.Ed. 608. We reached a consistent result under analogous circumstances in Carter v. State of Tennessee, 6 Cir., 1927, 18 F. 2d 850. There, a three-year delay of trial in the United States District Court had resulted from the incar…
• Territory OF Alaska v. Am. CAN Co., 246 F.2d 493 (9th Cir. 1957)
  …that the very title of the repealing act underlines one of its main purposes; namely, that of “excepting from repeal certain taxes and tax exemptions.” In John J. Sesnon Co. v. United States, 9 Cir., 1910, 182 F. 573, 576, certiorari denied, 1911, 220 U.S. 609, 31 S.Ct. 714, 55 L.Ed. 608, a case that came to this Court from Alaska, Judge Morrow observed : “Where doubt exists as to the meaning of the statute, the title may be looked to for aid in its construction.” In the repealing statute before us, the…