JAMES H. BURTON, PETITIONER,
v.
CURTIS M. JENNINGS, SOLE SURVIVING PARTNER, ETC.

U.S. | 1911-04-10
No. 960
220 U.S. 613 Supreme Court of the United States (1911) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Ex parte Peterson, 253 U.S. 300 (U.S. 1920)
    …by consent of the parties, the same court taxed both the auditor’s and the stenographer’s fees against the losing party, holding that it had discretion, if it was not obliged to do so; and a petition for writ of certiorari was denied by this court; 220 U. S. 613. Although the order was erroneous in declaring that the expense of the auditor shall, instead of abiding the result of the action, be paid-by one or both of the parties in accordance with the determination of the trial judge, the error does not req…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw