THE BOISE ARTESIAN HOT & COLD WATER COMPANY, LIMITED, PETITIONER,

v.

BOISE CITY, IDAHO

Citator

Cited By

• Mitchell v. Whitman, 94 F.2d 917 (8th Cir. 1938)
  …v. Rosengard, 299 U.S. 562, 57 S.Ct. 25, 81 L.Ed. 414; In re A. Herz, Inc., 81 F. 2d 511, 512, 513; In re Marcuse & Co., 11 F. 2d 513; Linen Thread Co. v. A. Booth & Co., 192 F. 515, 517; Guaranty Trust Co. v. Chicago Rys. Co., 185 F. 411, 415; Id., 220 U.S. 616, 31 S.Ct. 720, 55 L.Ed. 611; In re Curtis, 100 F. 784, 785, certiorari denied Wilson v. Dunseth, 179 U.S. 683, 21 S.Ct. 916, 45 L.Ed. 385; In re Sheridan-Melrose Bldg. Corp., 86 F. 2d 2. Ninth Circuit: — Crump v. Ramish, 86 F. 2d 362, 363; Oakland…
• Jacobs v. United States, 97 F.2d 784 (7th Cir. 1938)
  …is share and the share which he receives as a result of the-death-of his co-tenant is a new one. Co-tenants possess the incidents of enjoyment such as sale, mortgage, lease and partition. U. S. v. Robertson, 7 Cir., 183 F. 711; Robertson v. U. S., 220 U.S. 616, 31 S.Ct. 720, 55 L.Ed. 611. This distinction must be kept in mind, for it affects vitally the question before us. In Knox v. McElligott, 258 U.S. 546, 42 S.Ct. 396, 66 L.Ed. 760, a husband and wife in 1912 acquired certain property as joint tenan…