JOHN M. WATERBURY AND CHAUNCEY MARSHALL, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR,
v.
PHENIX NATIONAL BANK
JOHN M. WATERBURY AND CHAUNCEY MARSHALL, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR,
PHENIX NATIONAL BANK
220 U.S. 625
Supreme Court of the United States (1911)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Dunn v. Ickes, 115 F.2d 36 (D.C. Cir. 1940)…upra, and see the relevant statutory provision, supra n. 5. United States ex rel. Riverside Oil Co. v. Hitchcock, 21 App.D.C. 252, affirmed 190 U.S. 316, 23 S.Ct. 698, 47 L.Ed. 1074; Moore v. United States ex rel. Boyer, 32 App.D.C. 243, dismissed, 220 U.S. 625, 31 S.Ct. 717, 55 L.Ed. 614; Commercial Solvents Corp. v. Mellon, 51 App.D.C. 146, 277 F. 548. See authorities cited 18 R.C.L., Mandamus, §§ 38-39; 38 C.J., Mandamus § 199. There is a legal presumption that governmental administrative officials hav…1 / 2