YEUNG HOW, SOMETIMES KNOWN AS YEUNG CHOW, APPELLANT,
v.
HART H. NORTH, UNITED STATES COMMISSIONER OF IMMIGRATION, ETC., ET AL.
YEUNG HOW, SOMETIMES KNOWN AS YEUNG CHOW, APPELLANT,
HART H. NORTH, UNITED STATES COMMISSIONER OF IMMIGRATION, ETC., ET AL.
223 U.S. 705
Supreme Court of the United States (1911)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Farrell v. O’Brien, 199 U. S. 100; David Kaufman & Sons Co. v. Smith, 216 U. S. 610; Fong Yue Ting v. United States, 149 U. S. 698, 716; § 14 of act of May 6, 1882, 22 Stat. 61.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Low Wah Suey v. Backus, 225 U.S. 460 (U.S. 1912)…In other 'cases the order of the executive officers within the authority of the statute is final. United States v. Ju Toy, 198 U. S. 253; Chin Yow v. United, States, 208 U. S. 8; Tang Tun v. Edsell, 223 U. S. 673. In the case of Yeung How v. North, 223 U. S. 705, decided at the present term, this court dismissed the appeal in a per curiam opinión. An examination of that case shows that it was in all respects like the case at bar, so. far as the status of Yeung How, the person deported, is concerned, she bei…
Authorities Cited
- Union Pac. Ry. Co. v. Taggart, 149 U.S. 698 (U.S. 1892)
- David Kaufman & Sons Co. v. Smith, 216 U.S. 610 (U.S. 1910)