EX PARTE: IN THE MATTER OF LOUIS CELLA ET AL., PETITIONERS
EX PARTE: IN THE MATTER OF LOUIS CELLA ET AL., PETITIONERS
223 U.S. 713
Supreme Court of the United States (1912)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State ex rel. R.R. Comm'rs v. Atl. Coast Line R.R. Co. & Clyde S.S. Co., 81 Fla. 168 (Fla. 1921)…R. Co., 62 Fla. 315, 57 South. Rep. 175; Mill Creek Coal & Coke Co. v. Public Service Commission, — West. Va. —, 100 S. E. Rep. 557, 7 A. L. R. 1081; Pittsburg, C. C. & St. L. R. Co. v. State of Indiana, 172 Ind. 147, 87 N. E. Rep. 1034, affirmed in 223 U. S. 713, 32 Sup. Ct. Rep. 520. The Florida statute does not supplement the Federal Act, but covers a subject not included in the Federal statute. See Savage v. Jones, and Sligh v. Kirkwood, supra. Even if the Federal Act fairly covers the subject, it does…
-
Wheeler v. United States, 226 U.S. 478 (U.S. 1913)
-
S. Ry. Co. v. R.R. Comm'n of Ind., 236 U.S. 439 (U.S. 1915)