WALTER MURPHY, PETITIONER,
v.
ASHLEY M. GOULD, ASSOCIATE JUSTICE, ETC.
WALTER MURPHY, PETITIONER,
ASHLEY M. GOULD, ASSOCIATE JUSTICE, ETC.
226 U.S. 613
Supreme Court of the United States (1913)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Louisville & Nashville R.R. Co. v. Woodford, 234 U.S. 46 (U.S. 1914)
-
Hill v. Hawes, 132 F.2d 569 (D.C. Cir. 1942)…on to mail the notice of entry of judgment and to make a note in the docket of the mailing was that of the clerk. It is well settled that the rules of this court have the force of law. Murphy v. Gould, 1912, 39 App.D.C. 363, certiorari denied, 1913, 226 U.S. 613, 33 S.Ct. 325, 57 L.Ed. 382; Talty v. District of Columbia, 1902, 20 App.D.C. 489. Cf. also Ex parte Dante, 1913, 228 U.S. 429, 33 S.Ct. 579, 57 L.Ed. 905. In that case the same Rule 10 of our old rules as is involved in the instant case was the s…