WALTER BAMFORD, APPELLANT,

v.

LINDSAY RUSSELL, TRUSTEE, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Pa. Coal Co. v. Mahon, 260 U.S. 393 (U.S. 1922)
  …eration, will not be held void as to a particular property, although proof is offered that owing to conditions peculiar to it the restriction could not reasonably be applied. See Powell v. Pennsylvania, 127 U. S. 678, 681, 684; Murphy v. California, 226 U. S. 623, 629. But even if the particular facts are tó govern, the statute should, in my opinion, be upheld in this- case. For the defendant has failed to adduce any evidence from which [*420] it appears that to restrict its mining operations was an unreason…
• Phillips v. Baker, 165 F.2d 578 (5th Cir. 1948)
  …have superior equities.’ The admitted flexibility of the doctrine is the sole manner in which the apparently conflicting decisions of the courts can be reconciled.” “* In re: Ennis ex parte Bamford, 2 Cir., 187 F. 720, at page 723, appeal dismissed 226 U.S. 623, 33 S.Ct. 110, 57 L.Ed. 386.” Meyer, “Stockbrokers and Stock Exchanges”, Sec. 166(e) — “Customers Whose Orders Have Been Bucketed”, p. 64-7; also Sees. 50 & 51, pp. 275, 279 et seq. Cf. In re: Tracy, 2 Cir., 191 F. 810; Leonard v. Hunt, 1 Cir., 36…
• In re I. C. Herman & Co., Inc. v. Taub, 497 F.2d 1301 (2d Cir. 1974)
  …of an obligation other than by a surety are payments induced by fraud or mistake or payments effected by the debtor’s wrongful use of another’s property, see, e. g., In re Ennis, 187 F. 720 (2 Cir. 1911), app. dismissed sub nom. Bamford v. Russell, 226 U.S. 623, 33 S.Ct. 110, 57 L.Ed. 386 (1912), it cannot be reasonably said, in light of the crucial role and extensive duties of a customs broker in effecting the rapid entry of imports, so well described in Union Brokerage Co. v. Jensen, 322 U.S. 202, 204-20…