CHANNING H. FOX, APPELLANT,
v.
FORT LAUDERDALE LINCOLN MERCURY COMPANY, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 1964-10-09
No. 5040
168 So. 2d 100 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1964) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Hines v. Trager Constr. Co., Inc., 188 So. 2d 826 (Fla. 1st DCA 1966)
    …cussed above. From our review we conclude that the remaining points are without substantial merit. The judgment appealed is accordingly affirmed. RAWLS, C. J., and CARROLL, DONALD K., J., concur. . Hines v. American Truss Co., Inc., (Fla.App.1964) 168 So. 2d 100. . 25 Fla.Jur. 249, Pleadings, § 93. . 13 Fla.Jur. 220, Evidence, § 222. . Younglove v. Knox, 44 Fla. 743, 33 So. 427. . Booth v. Lenox, 45 Fla. 191, 34 So. 566. . In re Price’s Estate, 129 Fla. 467, 176 So. 492. . Brickley v. Atlantic Coast L…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw