CITIZENS' TELEPHONE COMPANY OF JACKSON
v.
FULLER, AUDITOR GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN
Mr. Justice McKenna delivered the opinion of the court.
Appellant is a telephone company, located at the City of Jackson, State of Michigan, doing an extensive' business: It brought this bill in equity to restrain the collection of a tax levied under the laws considered in the preceding case, Citizens’ Telephone Co. v. Fuller, ante, p. 322. It is substantially like the bill in the latter case.
A demurrer was filed to the bill and, being overruled, an answer was filed. After hearing, a decree was entered dismissing the bill. This appeal was then taken.
The questions presented are the same as those presented in the preceding case and were submitted at the same time and on the same argument. On-the -authority of the opinion in that cáse the decree is
Affirmed,
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (15 total)
-
State v. Seaboard Air Line R.R. Co., 92 Fla. 63 (Fla. 1926)…n the transshipment of goods at a seaport for export or shipment to another state would convert the first leg of the journey into an intrastate movement. See Railroad Commission of Louisiana v. Texas & P. R. Co., 229 U. S. 336, 33 Sup. Ct. Rep. 837, 57 L. Ed. 1215; Southern Pac. Terminal Co. v. Interstate Commerce Commission, 219 U. S. 498, 31 Sup. Ct. Rep. 279, 55 L. Ed. 310; Railroad Commission of Ohio v. Worthington, 225 U. S. 101, 32 Sup. Ct. Rep. 653, 56 L. Ed. 1004; Texas & N. O. R. Co. v. Sabine Tram.…
-
S. Pac. Co. v. Van Hoosear, 72 F.2d 903 (9th Cir. 1934)…ed from cake to be purchased in the interior or then in transit to him.” This, moreover, was only one of several reasons for denying the contention of the appellant in that case. In Railroad Comm. of Louisiana v. Tex. & Pac. R. Co., 229 U. S. 336, 33 S. Ct. 837, 57 L. Ed. 1315 (1913), there is no indication, in either the Supreme or the District Court opinion, that the goods were regularly sold after their arrival at the port. In Railroad Commission of Ohio v. Worthington, 225 U. S. 101, 32 S. Ct. 653, 56…
-
Surf Sales Co. v. Fed. Trade Comm'n, 259 F.2d 744 (7th Cir. 1958)…stributed merchandise by means of push cards constituting unfair acts and practices, James v. F.T.C., 7 Cir., 1958, 253 F. 2d 78, and that they did so in interstate commerce. Railroad Commission of Louisiana v. Tex. & P. Ry. Co., 1913, 229 U.S. 336, 33 S.Ct. 837, 57 L.Ed. 1215; Ford Mo [*747] tor Company v. F.T.C., 6 Cir., 1941, 120 F. 2d 175,183. The only contention the petitioners really press is that the cease and desist order should not continue against Samuel Specter individually. Two witnesses, Char…
Previewing 3 of 15 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence