JOHN M. RHEA, PETITIONER,

v.

THE UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Westfall Larson & Co. v. All-Man-Hubble Tug Boat Co., 73 F.2d 200 (9th Cir. 1934)
  …y, in determining the question of laches, will he governed, “by analogy,” by the state statute of limitations covering actions of the nature disclosed by the libel. In Davis v. Smokeless Fuel Co. (C. C. A. 2) 196 F. 753, 755, 756, certiorari denied 229 U. S. 617, 618, 33 S. Ct. 777, 57 L. Ed. 1353, the court said: “Still courts in admiralty proceed upon the analogy of the statute in considering whether claims are stale. Nesbit v. The Am-boy (D. C.) 36 F. 935. If because of the absence of the respondent or…
• White v. United States, 67 F.2d 71 (10th Cir. 1933)
  …is proper protection against unpreparedness and surprise, is by timely motion to compel the prosecutor to furnish him with a bill of particulars.” These authorities were followed in May v. United States (C. C. A. 8) 199 F. 53, 61, certiorari denied, 229 U. S. 617, 33 S. Ct. 777, 57 L. Ed. 1353; Rimmerman v. United States (C. C. A. 8) 186 F. 307, 310; Cochran v. United States (C. C. A. 8) 41 F.(2d) 193,198; Lewis v. United States (C. C. A. 1) 295 F. 441, certiorari denied 265 U. S. 594, 44 S. Ct. 636, 68 L. E…