JOHN RONEY ET AL., PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR,
v.
H. J. VAN NESS
JOHN RONEY ET AL., PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR,
H. J. VAN NESS
231 U.S. 737
Supreme Court of the United States (1913)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Revised Statutes, § 1008; Allen v. Southern Pacific R. R. Co., 173 U. S. 479, 484; Aspen Min. & Smelting Co. v. Billings, 150 U. S. 31, 36; Scarborough v. Pargoud, 108 U. S. 567.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Egan v. The State of N.J., 234 U.S. 751 (U.S. 1914)…Per Curiam. Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Zeller v. New Jersey, 231 U. S. 737, and' bases cited.…
-
Gen. Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Lawrence, 9 F.2d 64 (8th Cir. 1925)…an appellate court. Tho above decision has been quoted with approval in Mussina v. Cavazos, 6 Wall. 355, 18 L. Ed. 810, and followed by the Supreme Court in Scarborough v. Pargoud, 108 U. S. 567, 2 S. Ct. 877, 27 L. Ed. 824, and Roney v. Van Ness, 231 U. S. 737, 34 S. Ct. 316, 58 L. Ed. 460. The same rule has been announced and followed in this circuit in U. S. v. Baxter, 51 F. 624, 2 C. C. A. 410, and Greyerbiehl v. Hughes Electric Co. (C. C. A.) 294 F. 802, 804. Also, in tho Second Circuit in Siegelschif…
Authorities Cited
- Aspen Mining & Smelting Co. v. Billings, 150 U.S. 31 (U.S. 1893)
- Scarborough v. Pargoud, 108 U.S. 567 (U.S. 1883)
- Allen v. S. Pac. R.R. Co., 173 U.S. 479 (U.S. 1899)