WEINFELD

v.

FLORIDA INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Nahar v. Oral Mildred Jap-A-Joe Nahar, 656 So. 2d 225 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995)
  …that Roebi [the husband] was a domiciliary of Aruba and that his estate was governed by Dutch law. Administration of an estate is governed by the law of the decedent’s domicile, See Biederman v. Cheatham, 161 So. 2d 538 (Fla. 2d DCA), cert. denied, 168 So. 2d 146 (Fla.1964), and the forum will apply its own rules in determining the person’s domicile prior to determining the applicable substantive law. [*235] See Restatement (Second), Conflict of Law, § 13; see and compare Mississippi Choctaw Indians v. Holyf…

  ← 1 / 3 →
• Thomas v. State, 201 So. 2d 834 (Fla. 2d DCA 1967)
  …d his plea of guilty to the escape charge with all knowledge and understanding of its effect and possible consequences. In doing so, he waived his right to a jury trial. Smith v. State, Fla. App., 168 So. 2d 585, 586, cert. dismissed mem., Fla.1964, 168 So. 2d 146. The court below correctly denied his motion to vacate judgment and sentence. Affirmed. LILES, C. J., and SHANNON and HOBSON, JJ., concur.…
• Kacsir v. State, 456 So. 2d 528 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984)
  …d in this appeal. Conflicts in the testimony presented questions of credibility to be determined by the fact-finder, here the appeals referee. See Florida State Board of Dental Examiners v. Feinglass, 166 So. 2d 686 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. dismissed, 168 So. 2d 146 (Fla.1964). Finding that the order appealed is supported by competent, substantial evidence, we affirm. Affirmed.…