F. O. NORRIS ET AL., APPELLANTS,
v.
J. E. JOHNSON ET AL.
F. O. NORRIS ET AL., APPELLANTS,
J. E. JOHNSON ET AL.
232 U.S. 715
Supreme Court of the United States (1914)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam. Dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Holden v. Stratton, 191 U. S. 115; First National Bank v. Title & Trust Company, 198 U. S. 280, 288; Hatch v. Ketchum, Trustee, 198 U. S. 580; Duryea Power Company v. Sternberger, 218 U. S. 299, 301.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Sword Line, Inc. v. Indus. Comm'r of State of N.Y., 212 F.2d 865 (2d Cir. 1954)…ptions, be it noted, were general, without peculiar application to tax claims. The first exception was applied (without resort to the rationale of interest as “suspended”) in Johnson v. Norris, 5 Cir., 190 F. 459, appeal dismissed Norris v. Johnson, 232 U.S. 715, 34 S.Ct. 330, 58 L.Ed. 811, and in American Iron & Steel Mfg. Co. v. Seaboard Air Line Ry., 233 U.S. 261, 267, 34 S.Ct. 502, 505, 58 L.Ed. 949, a receivership case, where the Court said: “For, manifestly, the law does not contemplate that either th…
Authorities Cited
- First Nat'l Bank of Chicago v. Chicago Title & Tr. Co., 198 U.S. 280 (U.S. 1905)
- Holden v. Stratton, 191 U.S. 115 (U.S. 1903)
- Duryea Power Co. v. Sternbergh, 218 U.S. 299 (U.S. 1910)
- Look v. Ross, 198 U.S. 580 (U.S. 1905)