C. H. ALBERS COMMISSION COMPANY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
v.
MARY E. SPENCER AND HARLOW B. SPENCER, EXECUTRIX AND EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF CORWIN H. SPENCER, DECEASED, ET AL.

U.S. | 1914-03-09
No. 581
232 U.S. 719 Supreme Court of the United States (1914) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Per_curiam

Per Curiam. Dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Kansas City Star Company v. Julian, 215 U. S. 589, 590; Wood v. Chesborough, 228 U. S. 672.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • …t the controversy as to the validity of the attachments with which the appeal before us is concerned has on three different occasions been here considered. de Bearn v. de Bearn, 225 U. S. 695; de Bearn v. de Bearn, 231 U. S. 741; de Bearn v. Winans, 232 U. S. 719. In the first, an. attempt to bring a controversy on the subject here was dismissed because of its prematurity. In the other two cases it appears that at the time the bill in this case was filed, the complainant was engaged in litigating in the cour…
    1 / 2

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw