C. H. ALBERS COMMISSION COMPANY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
v.
MARY E. SPENCER AND HARLOW B. SPENCER, EXECUTRIX AND EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF CORWIN H. SPENCER, DECEASED, ET AL.
C. H. ALBERS COMMISSION COMPANY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
MARY E. SPENCER AND HARLOW B. SPENCER, EXECUTRIX AND EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF CORWIN H. SPENCER, DECEASED, ET AL.
232 U.S. 719
Supreme Court of the United States (1914)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Per_curiam
Per Curiam. Dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Kansas City Star Company v. Julian, 215 U. S. 589, 590; Wood v. Chesborough, 228 U. S. 672.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
de Bearn v. Safe Deposit & Tr. Co. of Baltimore, 233 U.S. 24 (U.S. 1914)…t the controversy as to the validity of the attachments with which the appeal before us is concerned has on three different occasions been here considered. de Bearn v. de Bearn, 225 U. S. 695; de Bearn v. de Bearn, 231 U. S. 741; de Bearn v. Winans, 232 U. S. 719. In the first, an. attempt to bring a controversy on the subject here was dismissed because of its prematurity. In the other two cases it appears that at the time the bill in this case was filed, the complainant was engaged in litigating in the cour…1 / 2
Authorities Cited
- Wood v. Chesborough, 228 U.S. 672 (U.S. 1913)
- Kan. City Star Co. v. Julian, 215 U.S. 589 (U.S. 1909)