HENRY E. MEEKER, SURVIVING PARTNER, ETC., PETITIONER,

v.

LEHIGH VALLEY RAILROAD COMPANY; AND HENRY E. MEEKER, PETITIONER, V. LEHIGH VALLEY RAILROAD COMPANY

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Mayer, 235 U.S. 55 (U.S. 1914)
• Meeker v. Lehigh Valley R.R. Co., 236 U.S. 412 (U.S. 1915)
  …rates and unjust discrimination. The plaintiff prevailed in the District Court, but the Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the judgment, 211 Fed. Rep. 785, and a writ of [*418] certiorari granted under § 262 of the Judicial Code brings the case here. 234 U. S. 749. The plaintiff was the surviving member of Meeker & Company, a" copartnership, and sued in that capacity. This firm was engaged in the anthracite coal trade in New York City and was accustomed to purchase its coal at; collieries in Pennsylvania and…
• Spiller v. Atchison, 253 U.S. 117 (U.S. 1920)
  …au Ow Bew v. United States, 144 U. S. 47, 58; In re Chetwood, 165 U. S. 443, 462; Whitney v. Dick, 202 U. S. 132, 135; McClellan v. Carland, 217 U. S. 268, 277, et seq.; United States v. Beatty, 232 U. S. 463, 467; Meeker v. Lehigh Valley R. R. Co., 234 U. S. 749; 236 U. S. 412, 417. Coming to the merits: The ground upon which the Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the judgments, and the ground principally relied upon to sustain its decision, was the refusal by the trial court of a motion made by defendants…

Authorities Cited

• McCLELLAN v. Carland, 217 U.S. 268 (U.S. 1910)
• In re Chetwood, 165 U.S. 443 (U.S. 1897)
• Whitney v. Dick, 202 U.S. 132 (U.S. 1906)
• United States v. Beatty, 232 U.S. 463 (U.S. 1914)