THE UNITED STATES, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,

v.

HOLLAND-AMERICAN LINE

Citator

Cited By

• In re Saco Local Dev. Corp., 711 F.2d 441 (1st Cir. 1983)
  …er & Co. v. Munsuri, 222 U.S. 114, 118, 32 S.Ct. 67, 69, 56 L.Ed. 118 (1911); Broders v. Lage, 25 F. 2d 288, 289 (8th Cir.1928); In re Breyer Printing Co., 216 F. 878, 880 (7th Cir.), cert, denied sub nom. Borland v. Central Trust Co., 235 U.S. 701, 35 S.Ct. 203, 59 L.Ed. 432 (1914); Morehouse v. Pacific Hardware & Steel Co., 177 F. 337, 340 (9th Cir.1910). The value of immediate appellate review was thought to be so great that, while most appeals from orders in bankruptcy “proceedings” could only be hear…
• United States v. Nederlandsch-Amerikaansche Stoomvaart Maatschappij (holland-America Lijn.), 254 U.S. 148 (U.S. 1920)
  …of New York and temporarily detained and subsequently admitted. A judgment in favor of the Company was [*152] subsequently reviewed by the Circuit Court of Appeals and was theré affirmed. (See 212 Fed. Rep. 116, affirmed by an equally divided court, 235 U. S. 686.) It is further alleged that the exaction from the claimant • of the above mentioned hospital charges under duress was in violation of its rights and privileges secured to petitioner'as a subject of the Kingdom of the Netherlands under the Constitu…
• In re The Duplan Corp. v. Alfred P. Slaner in Reorganization of The Duplan Corp., 591 F.2d 139 (2d Cir. 1978)
  …at this is immaterial. . Two frequently cited cases, both finding a “controversy”, one of which was affirmed by the Supreme Court, are In re Breyer Printing Co., 216 F. 878 (7 Cir.), cert. denied sub nom. Borland v. Central Trust Co., 235 U.S. 701, 35 S.Ct. 203, 59 L.Ed. 432 (1914) (stressing that at the time of adjudication the creditor had possession of the goods constituting the security), and In re Hartzell, 209 F. 775 (8 Cir. 1913) (stressing that the mortgage creditor who had appeared in answer to a…