J. F. SMITH ET AL., PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR,
v.
GEORGE LEAVENWORTH

U.S. | 1914-11-09
No. 41
235 U.S. 690 Supreme Court of the United States (1914)

Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Rogers v. Jones, 214 U. S. 196, 204; Wood v. Chesborough, 228 U. S. 672, 677; (2) Castillo v. McConnico, 168 U. S. 674; de Bearn v. Safe Deposit Co., 233 U. S. 24, 34; McDonald v. Oregon Navigation Co., 233 U. S. 665, 670; (3) New Orleans Waterworks Co. v. Louisiana, 185 U. S. 336, 344; Gring v. Ives, 222 U. S. 365, 370; Ennis Water Works v. Ennis, 233 U. S. 652.

Mr. John W. Cutrer and Mr. O. G. Johnston for the plaintiffs in error. Mr. Gerald FitzGerald and Mr. Edward Mayes for . the defendant in error.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw