JOHN JENKINS, APPELLANT,
v.
MAXWELL LAND GRANT COMPANY
JOHN JENKINS, APPELLANT,
MAXWELL LAND GRANT COMPANY
235 U.S. 691
Supreme Court of the United States (1914)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
Judgment affirmed with costs upon the authority of Gildersleeve v. New Mexico Mining Co., 161 U. S. 573; Harrison v. Perea, 168 U. S. 311, 323; Wm. W. Bierce, Ltd., v. Hutchins, 205 U. S. 340, 344, and cause remanded to the Supreme Court of the State of New Mexico.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
PAN Am. Petroleum Corp. v. Manuelita Candelaria, 403 F.2d 351 (10th Cir. 1968)…necessary to constitute adverse possession, namely, actual, visible, exclusive, hostile, and continuous possession, is lacking, then no title by adverse possession can ripen. Jenkins v. Maxwell Land Grant Co., 15 N.M. 281, 107 P. 739 (1910), aff’d. 235 U.S. 691, 35 S.Ct. 205, 59 L.Ed. 427 (1914). Also see, Merrifield v. Buckner, 41 N.M. 442, 70 P. 2d 896 (1937), and Flores v. Bruesselbach, 149 F. 2d 616 (10th Cir. 1945). The adverse possession statute also specifically requires that the taxes be paid. It i…
Authorities Cited
- Bierce v. Hutchins, 205 U.S. 340 (U.S. 1907)
- Harrison v. Perea, 168 U.S. 311 (U.S. 1897)
- Gildersleeve v. N.M. Mining Co., 161 U.S. 573 (U.S. 1896)