OSWALD WEST, AS GOVERNOR, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR,
v.
CORVALLIS & EASTERN RAILROAD COMPANY
OSWALD WEST, AS GOVERNOR, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR,
CORVALLIS & EASTERN RAILROAD COMPANY
235 U.S. 691
Supreme Court of the United States (1914)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Preston v. Chicago, 226 U. S. 447, 450; McDonald v. Oregon Navigation Co., 233 U. S. 665; People ex rel. Hastings v. Jackson, 112 U. S. 233, 236; (2) Marshall, Governor, v. Dye, 231 U. S. 250.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
PAN Am. Petroleum Corp. v. Manuelita Candelaria, 403 F.2d 351 (10th Cir. 1968)…necessary to constitute adverse possession, namely, actual, visible, exclusive, hostile, and continuous possession, is lacking, then no title by adverse possession can ripen. Jenkins v. Maxwell Land Grant Co., 15 N.M. 281, 107 P. 739 (1910), aff’d. 235 U.S. 691, 35 S.Ct. 205, 59 L.Ed. 427 (1914). Also see, Merrifield v. Buckner, 41 N.M. 442, 70 P. 2d 896 (1937), and Flores v. Bruesselbach, 149 F. 2d 616 (10th Cir. 1945). The adverse possession statute also specifically requires that the taxes be paid. It i…
Authorities Cited
- Marshall v. DYE, 231 U.S. 250 (U.S. 1913)
- McDONALD v. Or. R.R. & Navigation Co., 233 U.S. 665 (U.S. 1914)
- Preston v. City of Chicago, 226 U.S. 447 (U.S. 1913)
- People of the State of Cal. Ex rel. Hastings v. Jackson & Another, 112 U.S. 233 (U.S. 1884)