LOUISVILLE & NASHVILLE RAILROAD COMPANY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
v.
L. M. RHODA, AS ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF CLARENCE RHODA, DECEASED
LOUISVILLE & NASHVILLE RAILROAD COMPANY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
L. M. RHODA, AS ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF CLARENCE RHODA, DECEASED
238 U.S. 608
Supreme Court of the United States (1915)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
Judgment reversed upon the authority of Michigan Central R. R. v. Vreeland, 227 U. S. 59; American Bailroad of Porto Rico v. Didricksen, 227 U. S. 145; Culf, Colorado, &c. Ry. v. McGinnis, 228 U. S. 173; Garrett v. Louisville & Nashville R. R., 235 U. S. 308.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Louisville & Nashville R.R. Co. v. Rhoda, 73 Fla. 12 (Fla. 1917)…Porto Rico v. Didrickson, 227 U. S. 145, 33 Sup. Ct. Rep. 224; Gulf, C. & S. F. R. Co. v. McGinniss, 228 U. S. 173, 33 Sup. Ct. Rep. 426; Garrett v. Louisville & N. R. R. Co., 235 U. S. 308,” 35 Sup. Ct. Rep. 32; Louisville & N. R. R. Co. v. Rhoda, 238 U. S. 608, 35 Sup. Ct. Rep. 662. The amended declaration on which the last trial was had alleges that the railroad company “so carelessly and negligently ran and operated its * * * engine; that the same was run against, over and upon * * * Clarence Rhoda, th…
-
In re ROM, 459 F.2d 15 (3d Cir. 1972)…bpoena is for purposes of appeal interlocutory, and hence not appealable. United States v. Ryan, 402 U.S. 530, 532, 91 S. Ct. 1580, 29 L.Ed.2d 85 (1971); Cobbledick v. United States, 309 U.S. 323, 60 S.Ct. 540, 84 L.Ed. 783 (1940); Peters v. Ferris, 238 U.S. 608, 35 S.Ct. 662, 59 L.Ed. 1487 (1914); Webster Coal & Coke Co. v. Cassatt, 207 U.S. 181, 28 S. Ct. 108, 52 L.Ed. 160 (1907); Haight & Freese Co. v. Robinson, 203 U.S. 581, 27 S.Ct. 780, 51 L.Ed. 327 (1906); Alexander v. United States, 201 U.S. 117, 12…
Authorities Cited
- Mich. Cent. R.R. Co. v. Vreeland, 227 U.S. 59 (U.S. 1913)
- Gulf v. McGINNIS, 228 U.S. 173 (U.S. 1913)
- Am. R.R. Co. of Porto RICO v. Didricksen, 227 U.S. 145 (U.S. 1913)
- Garrett v. Louisville & Nashville R.R. Co., 235 U.S. 308 (U.S. 1914)