THE BRUNER OIL COMPANY ET AL., PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR,
v.
THE DEMING INVESTMENT COMPANY
THE BRUNER OIL COMPANY ET AL., PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR,
THE DEMING INVESTMENT COMPANY
238 U.S. 610
Supreme Court of the United States (1915)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
Judgment affirmed with costs upon the authority of Skelton v. Dill, 235 U. S. 206; Adkins v. Arnold, 235 U. S. 417.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State v. Simpson, 122 Fla. 582 (Fla. 1935)…arbitrary, whimsical, irrational, grossly oppressive, plainly unequal or contrary to common right, they will be upheld.” State v. Allen, 83 Fla. 214, 91 Sou. 104, 26 A. L. R. 735; Jackson v. Neff, 64 Fla. 326, 60 Sou. 350, writ of error dismissed in 238 U. S. 610, 35 S. Ct. 792, 59 L. Ed. 1488; Peninsular Gas Co. v. State, 68 Fla. 411, 67 So. 165; Amos v. Gunn, 84 Fla. 285, 94 So. 615; Amos v. [*614] Mathews, 99 Fla. 1, 65, 115, 126 So. 308; Sheip Co. v. Amos, 100 Fla. 863, 130 So. 699; Liggett Co. v. Amos,…
-
Broussard v. Baker, 241 U.S. 639 (U.S. 1916)…Lumber Co. v. Pierce, 235 U. S. 380, 382; (2) Fischer v. St. Louis, 194 U. S. 361; Davis v. Massachusetts [*640], 167 U. S. 43; (3) Iowa Central Ry. v. Iowa, 160 U. S. 389; Washington v. Miller, 235 U. S. 422, 429; Roby v. South Park Commissioners, 238 U. S. 610. Mr. Frederick S. Tyler for the plaintiff in error. No appearance for defendant in error.…
Authorities Cited
- Skelton v. Dill, 235 U.S. 206 (U.S. 1914)
- Adkins v. Arnold, 235 U.S. 417 (U.S. 1914)