STATE SAVINGS & COMMERCIAL BANK, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
v.
ALDEN ANDERSON ET AL.
STATE SAVINGS & COMMERCIAL BANK, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
ALDEN ANDERSON ET AL.
238 U.S. 611
Supreme Court of the United States (1915)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
Judgment affirmed, with costs, upon the authority of Engel v. O’Malley, 219 U. S. 128; Noble State Bank v. Haskell, 219 U. S. 104.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Fid. Sav. & Loan Ass'n v. Fed. Home Loan Bank Bd., 689 F.2d 803 (9th Cir. 1982)…Trede, 21 Cal.2d at 634, 134 P. 2d 745 (right of Commissioner to liquidate association is delayed pending the outcome of suit challenging Commissioner’s actions); State Savings & Commercial Bank v. Anderson, 165 Cal. 437, 447-48 (1913), aff’d mem., 238 U.S. 611, 35 S.Ct. 792, 59 L.Ed. 1488 (1915) (parallel provision of Bank Act allows superintendent to take temporary custody of bank pending action challenging superintendent’s findings). It is true, however, that Evans II did not address the question wheth…1 / 2
-
First State Bank OF N. Cal. v. Bank OF Am., 618 F.2d 603 (9th Cir. 1980)…f Receivers, p. 944, § 579 (3d ed. 1959). FSB could have contested the receivership but failed to do so, and thereby waived its objection to the liquidation of its affairs. State Savings Bank v. Anderson, 165 Cal. 437, 132 P. 755 (1913), aff'd mem., 238 U.S. 611, 35 S.Ct. 792, 59 L.Ed. 1488 (1914). FDIC, under the purchase agreement approved by the California courts under state law, Cal.Fin.Code §§ 3108, 3110, 3110.1, 3223, now owns the choses in action which belonged to FSB before its liquidation. FSB is…
Authorities Cited
- Noble State Bank v. Haskell, 219 U.S. 104 (U.S. 1911)
- Engel v. O'Malley, 219 U.S. 128 (U.S. 1911)