ARIZONA COPPER COMPANY, LTD., PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
v.
THE STATE OF ARIZONA AT THE RELATION OF AND TO THE USE OF JOHN M. WEBSTER, TREASURER AND EX OFFICIO TAX COLLECTOR IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF GREENLEE, STATE OF ARIZONA
ARIZONA COPPER COMPANY, LTD., PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
THE STATE OF ARIZONA AT THE RELATION OF AND TO THE USE OF JOHN M. WEBSTER, TREASURER AND EX OFFICIO TAX COLLECTOR IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF GREENLEE, STATE OF ARIZONA
238 U.S. 611
Supreme Court of the United States (1915)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Per_curiam
[*611] Per Curiam.
Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Eustis v. Bolles, 150 U. S. 361; Yazoo & Miss. V. R. R. v. Brewer, 231 U. S. 245; Holden Land Co. v. Interstate Trading Co., 233 U. S. 536.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Fid. Sav. & Loan Ass'n v. Fed. Home Loan Bank Bd., 689 F.2d 803 (9th Cir. 1982)…Trede, 21 Cal.2d at 634, 134 P. 2d 745 (right of Commissioner to liquidate association is delayed pending the outcome of suit challenging Commissioner’s actions); State Savings & Commercial Bank v. Anderson, 165 Cal. 437, 447-48 (1913), aff’d mem., 238 U.S. 611, 35 S.Ct. 792, 59 L.Ed. 1488 (1915) (parallel provision of Bank Act allows superintendent to take temporary custody of bank pending action challenging superintendent’s findings). It is true, however, that Evans II did not address the question wheth…1 / 2
-
First State Bank OF N. Cal. v. Bank OF Am., 618 F.2d 603 (9th Cir. 1980)…f Receivers, p. 944, § 579 (3d ed. 1959). FSB could have contested the receivership but failed to do so, and thereby waived its objection to the liquidation of its affairs. State Savings Bank v. Anderson, 165 Cal. 437, 132 P. 755 (1913), aff'd mem., 238 U.S. 611, 35 S.Ct. 792, 59 L.Ed. 1488 (1914). FDIC, under the purchase agreement approved by the California courts under state law, Cal.Fin.Code §§ 3108, 3110, 3110.1, 3223, now owns the choses in action which belonged to FSB before its liquidation. FSB is…
Authorities Cited
- Eustis v. Bolles, 150 U.S. 361 (U.S. 1893)
- Holden Land & Live Stock Co. v. Inter-State Trading Co., 233 U.S. 536 (U.S. 1914)
- Yazoo & Miss. Valley R.R. Co. v. Brewer, 231 U.S. 245 (U.S. 1913)