LAURA EICHEL ET AL., APPELLANTS,
v.
UNITED STATES FIDELITY & GUARANTY COMPANY

U.S. | 1915-11-08
No. 397
239 U.S. 629 Supreme Court of the United States (1915) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of United States v. Krall, 174 U. S. 385; German National Bank v. Speckert, 181 U. S. 405; United States v. Beatty, 232 U. S. 463.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • F. H. McGRAW & Co., Inc. v. Milcor Steel Co., 149 F.2d 301 (2d Cir. 1945)
    …. Culver, 3 Denio, N.Y., 284; while cases outside that jurisdiction, where apt at all, depend on law not applied in New York, e. g., United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Eichel, 3 Cir., 219 F. 803, rehearing denied, 3 Cir., 233 F. 991, dismissed 239 U. S. 629, 36 S.Ct. 165, 60 L.Ed. 475, that allocation if not made at the time of payment is then by rule of law, or Columbia Digger Co. v. Rector, D.C.W.D.Wash., 215 F. 618, a leading case for the Fifth Circuit view discussed in the original opinion and agai…
  • …d for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Heike v. United States, 217 U. S. 423, 429; United States v; Beatty, 232 U. S., 463, 466; Bexford v. Brunswick-Balke-Collehder Co., 228 U. S. 339, 346. And see Pichel v. U. S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co., 239 U. S. 629.…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw