YORK & WHITNEY COMPANY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
v.
THE NEW YORK, NEW HAVEN & HARTFORD RAILROAD COMPANY
YORK & WHITNEY COMPANY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
THE NEW YORK, NEW HAVEN & HARTFORD RAILROAD COMPANY
239 U.S. 631
Supreme Court of the United States (1915)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for the. want of jurisdiction upon, the authority of (1) Leathe v. Thomas, 207 U. S. 93; Yazoo & Miss. Valley R. R. v. Brewer, 231 U. S. 245, 249; The Mellon Company v. McCafferty, this day decided, ante, p. 134; (2) Equitable Life Assurance Society v. Brown, 187 U. S. 308, 314; Consolidated Turnpike Co. v. Norfolk &c. Ry., 228 U. S. 596, 600; Easterling Lumber Co. v. Pierce, 235 U. S. 380; see Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. Maxwell, 237 U. S. 94, 97-98, and cases cited.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Pa. R.R. Co. v. W. F. Jacoby & Co., 242 U.S. 89 (U.S. 1916)…term, 1915. At that term the judgment below was affirmed, with costs, by a divided court. Afterwards, and at the same term, á ‘petition for rehearing was granted and the former judgment set aside, and the case restored to the docket for reargument. 239 U. S. 631. At the trial in the District Court the plaintiffs offered [*94] no other testimony as to the amount of damages sustained by them than that contained in the orders of the Commission, before recited. Section 16 of the Act makes the findings and orde…
Authorities Cited
- Louisville & Nashville R.R. Co. v. Maxwell, 237 U.S. 94 (U.S. 1915)
- Consol. Tpk. Co. v. Norfolk & Ocean View Ry. Co., 228 U.S. 596 (U.S. 1913)
- Equitable Life Assurance Soc'y v. Brown, 187 U.S. 308 (U.S. 1902)
- Leathe v. Thomas, 207 U.S. 93 (U.S. 1907)
- Easterling Lumber Co. v. Pierce, 235 U.S. 380 (U.S. 1914)
- Yazoo & Miss. Valley R.R. Co. v. Brewer, 231 U.S. 245 (U.S. 1913)