CHACE AND OTHERS, APPELLANTS, AGAINST VASQUEZ, THE CONSUL GENERAL OF PORTUGAL, RESPONDENT
CHACE AND OTHERS, APPELLANTS, AGAINST VASQUEZ, THE CONSUL GENERAL OF PORTUGAL, RESPONDENT
11 Wheat. 429
Supreme Court of the United States (1826)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 6 L. Ed. 511 · 1826 U.S. LEXIS 326 · SCDB 1826-004
Cited by 16 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Forgay v. Conrad, 6 How. 201 (U.S. 1848)
-
McGOURKEY v. Toledo & Ohio Cent. Ry. Co., 146 U.S. 536 (U.S. 1892)…ids &c. Railway v. Simmons, 123 U. S. 52 ; Parsons v. Robinson, 122 U. S. 112. It is equally well settled that a decree in admiralty determining the question of liability for a collision or other tort, (The Palmyra, 10 Wheat. 502; Chace v. Vasquez, 11 Wheat. 429; Mordecai v. Lindsey, [The Mary Eddy,] 19 How. 199,) or in equity establishing the validity of a patent and referring the case to .a master to compute and report the damages, is interlocutory merely. Barnard v. Gibson, 7 How. 650; Humiston v. Staint…
-
Caradelis v. Refineria Panama, 384 F.2d 589 (5th Cir. 1967)
Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence