SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
v.
W. C. THURSTON

U.S. | 1916-02-21
Nos. 230, 231, 232 and 233
241 U.S. 642 Supreme Court of the United States (1916) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

Judgments reversed with costs upon the authority of Southern Railway v. Reid, 222 U. S. 424; Yazoo & Mississippi Valley Railroad v. Greenwood Grocery Co., 227 U. S. 1; Charleston & Western Carolina Railway v. Varnville Furniture Co., 237 U. S. 597.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Cuyahoga River Power Co. v. N. Realty Co., 244 U.S. 300 (U.S. 1917)
    …pplication to direct the Court of Appeals to certify the record for review, and its order dismissing the writ of error for want of jurisdiction,the contention is without merit. Stratton v. Stratton, 239 U. S. 55; Valley Steamship Company v. Wattawa, 241 U. S. 642; Second National Bank v. First National Bank, 242 U. S. 600. 2. It is contended that, conceding the existence of federal questions in the case, nevertheless as there were independent state grounds broad enough to sustain the judgment, there is no j…
  • …n which a final judgment could be rendered in this case in view of the refusal of the Supreme Court of Ohio to grant the motion to certify to it the record of the Court of Appeals. Stratton v. Stratton, 239 U. S. 55; Valley Steamship Co. v. Wattawa, 241 U. S. 642. By the new constitution of Ohio and subsequent legislation^ a.system of courts of original and appellate jurisdiction was established in that State. Section 1576, General Code, as amended, 103 Ohio Laws, 415, provides, among other things, that “th…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw