THE VALLEY STEAMSHIP COMPANY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,

v.

JOHN J. WATTAWA; AND THE VALLEY STEAMSHIP COMPANY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, V. JOSEPH MRAZ

Citator

Cited By

• Cuyahoga River Power Co. v. N. Realty Co., 244 U.S. 300 (U.S. 1917)
  …pplication to direct the Court of Appeals to certify the record for review, and its order dismissing the writ of error for want of jurisdiction,the contention is without merit. Stratton v. Stratton, 239 U. S. 55; Valley Steamship Company v. Wattawa, 241 U. S. 642; Second National Bank v. First National Bank, 242 U. S. 600. 2. It is contended that, conceding the existence of federal questions in the case, nevertheless as there were independent state grounds broad enough to sustain the judgment, there is no j…
• Second Nat'l Bank of Cincinnati v. First Nat'l Bank of Okeana, 242 U.S. 600 (U.S. 1917)
  …n which a final judgment could be rendered in this case in view of the refusal of the Supreme Court of Ohio to grant the motion to certify to it the record of the Court of Appeals. Stratton v. Stratton, 239 U. S. 55; Valley Steamship Co. v. Wattawa, 241 U. S. 642. By the new constitution of Ohio and subsequent legislation^ a.system of courts of original and appellate jurisdiction was established in that State. Section 1576, General Code, as amended, 103 Ohio Laws, 415, provides, among other things, that “th…

Authorities Cited

• Norfolk & Suburban Tpk. Co. v. Commonwealth of Va., 225 U.S. 264 (U.S. 1912)
• W. Union Tel. Co. v. Crovo, 220 U.S. 364 (U.S. 1911)
• Stratton v. Stratton, 239 U.S. 55 (U.S. 1915)