IGNATIUS TIMOTHY TRIBICH LINCOLN, APPELLANT,
v.
JAMES M. POWER, MARSHAL, ETC.
IGNATIUS TIMOTHY TRIBICH LINCOLN, APPELLANT,
JAMES M. POWER, MARSHAL, ETC.
241 U.S. 651
Supreme Court of the United States (1916)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 10 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
Judgment affirmed with costs upon the authority of (1) In re Luis Oteiza y Cortes, 136 U. S. 330, 334; Ornelas v. Ruiz, 161 U. S. 502, 508; Bryant v. The United States, 167 U. S. 104, 105; Terlinden v. Ames, 184 U. S. 270, 278; Elias v. Ramirez, 215 U. S. 398, 406-407; McNamara v. Henkel, 226 U. S. 520, 523; (2) David Kauffman & Sons Co. v. Smith, 216 U. S. 610; Toop v. Ulysses Land Co., 237 U. S. 580; Manila Investment Co. v. Trammell, 239 U. S. 31.
Mr. John Neville Boyle and Mr. Addison S. Pratt for the appellant. The Attorney General and Mr. Charles" Fox for the appellees.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Quinn v. Robinson, 783 F.2d 776 (9th Cir. 1986)…ecretary of State has sole discretion to determine whether a request for extradition should be denied because it is a subterfuge made for the purpose of punishing the accused for a political crime, see In re Lincoln, 228 F. 70 (E.D.N.Y.1915), aff'd, 241 U.S. 651, 36 S.Ct. [*790] 721, 60 L.Ed. 1222 (1916) (per curiam), or to refuse extradition on humanitarian grounds because of the procedures or treatment that await a surrendered fugitive, Arnbjornsdottir-Mendler v. United States, 721 F. 2d 679, 683 (9th Cir…
-
Sindona v. Grant, 619 F.2d 167 (2d Cir. 1980)…on request. Id. at 485. Judge Griesa was not obligated to do more in divining the motives of the Italian prosecution. See Garcia-Guillern v. United States, supra, 450 F. 2d at 1192; In re Lincoln, 228 F. 70, 73-74 (E.D.N.Y.1915), aff’d per curiam, 241 U.S. 651, 36 S.Ct. 721, 60 L.Ed. 1222 (1916). As it was, however, he examined the affidavits supporting Sin-dona’s political offense claim and found them to be “totally unpersuasive”, 450 F.Supp. at 639. On the record before us, we cannot disagree. Sindon…
-
Ziyad Abu Eain v. Wilkes, 641 F.2d 504 (7th Cir. 1981)…etion to determine whether or not a country’s requisition for extradition is made with a view to try or punish the fugitive for a political crime, i. e., whether the request is a subterfuge. In re Lincoln, 228 F. 70 (E.D.N.Y.1915), aff’d per curiam, 241 U.S. 651, 36 S.Ct. 721, 60 L.Ed. 1222 (1916); Note, Executive Discretion in Extradition, 62 Colum.L.Rev. 1313, 1323 (1962). In contrast, the Judicial branch has consistently determined whether or not the “political offense” provision applies to the crime ch…1 / 2
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Terlinden v. Ames, 184 U.S. 270 (U.S. 1902)
- McNAMARA v. Henkel, 226 U.S. 520 (U.S. 1913)
- Toop v. Ulysses Land Co., 237 U.S. 580 (U.S. 1915)
- Ornelas v. Ruiz, 161 U.S. 502 (U.S. 1896)
- In re Luis Oteiza y Cortes, 136 U.S. 330 (U.S. 1890)
- Bryant v. United States, 167 U.S. 104 (U.S. 1897)
- David Kaufman & Sons Co. v. Smith, 216 U.S. 610 (U.S. 1910)
- Elias v. Ramirez, 215 U.S. 398 (U.S. 1910)
- Manila Inv. Co. v. Trammell, 239 U.S. 31 (U.S. 1915)